Regime says opposition fighters must stop the violence first, as it deploys soldiers in rebel-held town in Idlib.
Syria has rejected a call by the UN chief for it to declare a unilateral ceasefire, insisting that rebels fighting the government must stop the violence first.
Jihad Makdissi, Syrian foreign ministry spokesperson, said on Wednesday that twice during the abortive UN military observer mission deployed to Syria between April and the end of August, the Syrian government had implemented a ceasefire.
But he said the rebels "used the opportunity to expand their armed deployment and increase casualties due to terrorist activities".
Battle for strategic town
Makdissi's comments came as the government was sending tanks from Mastumah, south of Idlib city, to Maarat al-Numan, a rebel source told an AFP news agency reporter in the nearby town of Sarmin.Jihad Makdissi, Syrian foreign ministry spokesperson, said on Wednesday that twice during the abortive UN military observer mission deployed to Syria between April and the end of August, the Syrian government had implemented a ceasefire.
But he said the rebels "used the opportunity to expand their armed deployment and increase casualties due to terrorist activities".
Battle for strategic town
It had also deployed soldiers along the highway to Maarat al-Numan to secure the passage of its heavy armour to the strategic town on the Damascus-Aleppo highway.
The opposition fighters were battling to halt their advance, however, using rocket launchers and improvised explosive devices, the source said, adding three tanks were damaged.
The intensifying battle for Maarat al-Numan was "very important", said the rebels who took control of the town on Tuesday after 48 hours of fierce fighting and heavy shelling.
Rebels also intercepted troops on the outskirts of Khan Sheikhun, south of Maaret al-Numan, where intense clashes erupted even as warplanes bombed rebel zones, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) said.
"If the rebels, who already have Maarat al-Numan and Saraqeb, take Khan Sheikhun, they will completely isolate regime troops in Aleppo because redeployments will not be able to arrive," Rami Abdel Rahman of the UK-based opposition watchdog group said.
Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, urged the Syrian regime on Tuesday to declare an immediate truce to bring an end to the conflict that he said had left 20,000 dead over the last 19 months.
"It is unbearable for the [Syrian] people to continue like this. That is why I have conveyed to the Syrian government [a] strong message that they should immediately declare a unilateral ceasefire."
Ban urged "the opposition forces to agree to this unilateral ceasefire when and if the Syrian government declares it" and he called on countries supplying arms to either side to stop in order to ease the suffering of the Syrian people.
Turkish warning
Separately, General Necdet Ozel,Turkey's top military commander, gave warning of a tougher response if Syria keeps hitting Turkish soil, as he visited the town of Akcakale, where cross-border shelling killed five civilians last week.
"We have retaliated [for Syrian shelling] and if it continues, we'll respond more strongly," Ozel said as he inspected Turkish troops on a tour of the heavily fortified border zone.
Following the deadly shelling in Akcakale on Wednesday of last week, Turkey's parliament approved the use of military force if necessary against Syria.
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkish prime minister, has also asked Syria not to test Turkey's patience.
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, NATO secretary-general, cautioned on Wednesday against escalation along the frontier, and said the alliance has "all necessary plans in place to protect and to defend Turkey if necessary".
Posted By: Maximilian Castelli
Source: AlJazeera
I think the ceasefire would be easier and this conflict would stop if other countries stopped giving weapons to both sides. The UN should do something to force the ceasefire.
ReplyDelete-Matthew Cypher
I agree with Matt, that the UN should force a ceasefire. However, it may prove quite difficult to do so. Can the UN really stop other countries from giving weapons to the Syrian government? But I would definitely hope that if the UN convinced the rebels to stop the violence, the Syrian government would be more likely to agree to a ceasefire. Hopefully the ceasefire will happen soon before Turkey has to get involved...
ReplyDeleteCecilia G
I agree, a ceasefire would be the best option. However, considering that neither sides are listening to diplomacy very well right now...we will have to see what happens. I just hope it all gets decided soon.
ReplyDelete-Maximilian Castelli
So pretty much all we can do is just wait and hope for the best haha.
ReplyDelete-Matthew Cypher
Honestly, the UN is being pretty pathetic in this situation. So you're telling me that the UN is going to "strongly urge" the Syrian government to stop when people die everyday? If the UN is going to attempt to police the world, then they better commit. Words mean nothing when you can't back it up. If the UN wants a ceasefire, they need to use force. If not, then they can stop wasting their time with empty speeches. However, I also agree with Cece in that the UN using force is a delicate, tricky matter. Somehow the two sides need to see that their violence is making the situation worse. If only everyone could just for a second take a step back and look at the big picture. -Mae Markowski
ReplyDeleteWhile a ceasefire would be the clearly ideal situation, the UN doesn't have the power to enforce anything. They have people there who can't fire weapons. It would also be impossible to convince countries to stop selling weapons because the money is worth more than peace. -Alex Canan
ReplyDelete