Saudi Arabia’s decision not to accept its UN Security Council seat sets an important precedent.
As a key member of the G20, the world’s most important oil producer and a significant political actor on the world stage, this is no empty symbolic gesture.
The UN Security Council has failed the Syrian people because it is sitting back and allowing the genocide to continue. We cannot pretend that this vital global organization is fulfilling its purpose of promoting international peace and security.
Experience has proven repeatedly that the Security Council is a hostage to the special interests of the permanent member states. Any one of them can paralyze international responses to major crises. Saudi Arabia’s decision can have positive benefits in several ways:
Firstly, by encouraging other states to follow this example and showing that the Security Council does not enjoy international legitimacy in its current form.
Secondly, by forcing the issue of UN reform and encouraging the international community to address this issue in a creative and positive manner. This can stimulate a wider public debate about the nature of the Security Council and whether it fulfills its purpose in the 21st century.
Thirdly, by highlighting the dangerous role that permanent member states such as Russia have played in undermining the credibility and effectiveness of the UN and blocking humanitarian action.
Finally, by showing that Arabian Gulf states can force the global political agenda and that they are not (operating) at the behest of a handful of states with questionable claims to permanent member status.
Saudi Arabia’s decision has caused a great deal of surprise and consternation on the world stage. Let’s hope this inspires a rethink of how our international political system functions — or fails to function! — Citizens for Bahrain, By e-mail
No comments:
Post a Comment