Showing posts with label Parrish Alto. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parrish Alto. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Shelling by rebels in Syria's Aleppo kills more than a dozen people

http://www.france24.com/en/20160503-Shelling-rebels-Syrias-Aleppo-kill-more-dozen-people

Syrian opposition fighters on Tuesday shelled government-held parts of Aleppo, killing at least 12 people, as the army claimed it was repelling a wide offensive by the rebels in the country's largest city.

Activists, meanwhile, said government forces were also shelling rebel-held parts of the city, killing two people and wounding several.
The escalation came as the diplomatic focus moved to Moscow where the U.N. envoy for Syria started talks in efforts to restore a piecemeal cease-fire that would also include the contested northern city.
Staffan de Mistura is expected to push that the truce also cover Aleppo, which has seen an escalation in violence in recent weeks. De Mistura's meeting with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov came a day after he met with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry in Geneva.
ADVERTISING
In opening remarks in Moscow, de Mistura said "we need to make sure the cessation of hostilities is brought back on track."
Aleppo has been the center of violence over the past 12 days that left more than 250 civilians dead in the contested city. The city was excluded from a truce declared unilaterally by the Syrian military last week for the capital, Damascus, and its suburbs and the coastal province of Latakia.
Syrian state TV said shells hit a government-held area during morning rush hour, killing seven people and wounding at least 35, while activists reported two dead in a rebel neighborhood. Hours later, some rockets hit a hospital killing and wounding dozens of people, the TV said.
The TV said one of the rockets hit the Dubeet hospital in the central neighborhood of Muhafaza. The TV did not give a breakdown of the casualties.
"Shells and mortar rounds are raining down on every neighborhood [of] Aleppo," said Aleppo-based health official Mohammad Hazouri, speaking from Al-Razi hospital. He said four people were killed and more than 30 wounded in Dubeet hospital alone, adding that half the casualties at the hospital were women and children.
He said the rebel bombardment of government-held parts of Aleppo on Tuesday killed a total of 12 people and wounded more than 70.
The Lebanon-based Al Mayadeen TV that has reporters in the government-held parts of Aleppo showed damage on both sides of the street in front of the hospital, which also appeared heavily damaged.
Cars in the street were scorched and some were turned over. The shops on the other side of the street showed moderate damage as smoke still climbed out of the wreckage.
The Syrian military said in a statement it is repelling a wide scale attack on Aleppo launched by "terrorists" - a government term that includes all armed groups fighting President Bashar Assad's forces.
Tuesday's statement said the attack was preceded by heavy shelling of residential areas of the city, which caused civilian casualties, including at a hospital that was hit. The army said the multi-pronged attack on Aleppo was launched by armed terrorist groups, including al-Qaida's branch in Syria, the Nusra Front, Ahrar al-Sham and the Army of Islam.
"Our armed forces are currently working on repelling the attack and appropriately returning fire," it said.
Information Minister Omran al-Zoubi warned militants they will face harsh retaliation for the shelling of civilian areas, saying the government's "patience is running out and if they don't stop targeting civilians in the coming hours ... they will pay a high price."
The activist Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights confirmed the shelling of government-held parts of the city, and also said that seven were killed, including a child. The Observatory said more than 50 were wounded, including some who were in critical condition, which could raise the death toll.
The Observatory and another activist group, the Local Coordination Committees, said government forces also shelled rebel-held parts of the city on Tuesday, killing two people and wounding several.
Also in northern Syria, warplanes carried out intense airstrikes on the city of Raqqa, the de facto capital of the extremist Islamic State group, in the early hours Tuesday. Activist groups said it was not clear if the warplanes were Russian or those of the U.S.-led coalition.
The Observatory, which has a network of activists around the country, said there were more than 35 air raids and that 18 people were killed, including five members of the Islamic State group. It said dozens were wounded.
The anti-IS group Raqqa Is Being Slaughtered Silently said the airstrikes killed 10 and wounded dozens - but different casualty figures are common in the chaos of Syria's civil war. The group said there were calls from mosque loudspeakers for the residents to donate blood.
IS suffered major setbacks over the past months in Syria against government forces and U.S.-backed Kurdish fighters including the loss of the central historic city of Palmyra.

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Iraq: Sadr supporters in mass protest for political reform

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36138283
Hundreds of thousands of people have taken to the streets of Iraq's capital, Baghdad, in protest at a months-long political crisis and lack of reform.
Shia cleric Moqtada Sadr has asked his supporters to march towards the Green Zone, where the government is based.
He wants Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi to press ahead with his plan to replace ministers appointed on the basis of political affiliation with technocrats.
Powerful parties in parliament have so far refused to approve the reshuffle.
Systemic political patronage has aided corruption in Iraq, depleting the government's resources as it struggles to cope with declining oil revenue and the cost of the war against the jihadist group Islamic State.

'Radical change needed'

The BBC's Ahmed Maher in Baghdad says this is one of the country's worst political crises since the US-led invasion and downfall of Saddam Hussein in 2003.
Members of the Iraqi parliament chat inside the parliament building in Baghdad (16 April 2016)Image copyrightReuters
Image captionMembers of Iraq's parliament have been unable to agree on a new cabinet line-up
For the past three weeks, MPs have been unable to agree on a new line-up of non-partisan ministers proposed by the embattled prime minister as a key element of programme to tackle corruption.
More than 100 MPs have been staging a sit-in in parliament since mid-April to express their frustration at others who have blocked votes on the reshuffle.
They even voted to sack the speaker of parliament, Salim al-Jabouri.
The political fight turned violent last week as rival MPs kicked and threw bottles of water at one another, our correspondent adds.
On Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of Mr Sadr's supporters heeded his call to "frighten" MPs from the main political parties, which rely on control of ministries for patronage and funds, and "compel" them to agree to the prime minister's reforms.
They marched from Tahrir Square in central Baghdad towards the entrance of the heavily-fortified Green Zone, where parliament was expected to convene in a fresh attempt to vote on the reshuffle.
Iraqi Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr speaks during news conference in Najaf (22 March 2016)Image copyrightReuters
Image captionMoqtada al-Sadr wants protesters to "compel" MPs to agree to the prime minister's proposals
"Our participation in the demonstration aims to reject this government for being sectarian," protester Abu Ali al-Zaidi told the AFP news agency.
The government "did not bring the country and Iraqis anything but poverty and killing", the taxi driver from the southern province of Maysan added.
The MP and former national security adviser, Mowaffak al-Rubaie, acknowledged the political system was "not working" and that "radical change" was necessary.
But he told the BBC that Tuesday's protests were "not terribly helpful".
"We need a calm political atmosphere to sit down and hammer out some political middle-of-the-way solutions for this stalemate," he added.

US warships may join EU in patrolling waters off Libya

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/25/us-warships-may-join-eu-in-patrolling-waters-off-libya
American warships may join European Union vessels off the coast of Libya by the summer in a Nato-led attempt to slow the flow of refugees from Africa into Europe, it emerged at a meeting of the G5 world leaders in Hanover.


Until now, the EU, through Operation Sophia, has been entirely responsible for policing the international waters off Libya and Nato has been patrolling the much narrower Aegean Sea between Turkey and Greece.
Officials at the G5 meeting said it was now being proposed that the EU and Nato work together off Libya sharing intelligence and assets to close down the smugglers’ networks. EU leaders, especially Italian ministers, are deeply concerned by a potential surge in the number of refugees reaching Europe from Africa, even though there has not yet been a spike in the figures this year.
The wider Libya mission is likely to be approved by alliance leaders at a Warsaw summit on 7 July, according to the Italian defence minister, Roberta Pinotti.
“At the Nato level, we have asked for Operation Active Endeavour to be recalibrated from an anti-terrorist operation in the eastern Mediterranean to one which oversees the Libyan coast,” said Pinotti.
Asked if she expected a green light at the Warsaw summit, Pinotti said: “Yes, certainly for the coordination of missions in the Mediterranean. At this summit, the proposal should become an effective decision.”
In a statement after the meeting, Downing Street said David Cameron “made the case for seeking to work with the new Libyan government to build the capacity of the Libyan coastguard to help stem the flow of illegal migration across the Mediterranean into Europe”.
Operation Sophia, stretchingfrom the territorial waters of Greece, south of Crete, to the Egyptian coast, is limited to gathering intelligence on smugglers’ networks and helping vessels in distress. The expansion of Nato’s role would be a further sign of US president Barack Obama’s recognition that the migration crisis is destabilising European politics and, as a result, US interests.
More than 350,000 migrants from all over the world have reached Italy on boats from Libya since the start of 2014.
Advertisement
It was being stressed that, in the short term, no naval blockade against Libyan refugees would be possible in Libyan sovereign waters unless and until there was a request from the Libyan government, and possibly a UN security council resolution.
The new UN-recognised Libyan government, headed by Fayez al-Sarraj, is struggling to gain political authority after years of civil war. It cannot be seen to be too dependent on the west and is not keen to accede to western demands such as allowing Nato warships interdicting vessels off the coast of Libya.
The Italian media reported that the Libyan government was likely first to ask for western help on Libyan soil to be focused on protecting Libyan oilfields from attacks by Islamic State fighters. The intervention could be seen as an effort to protect Libyan resources from fighters in Islamic State.


At the relatively brief G5 meeting, Cameron and Obama were joined by the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, the Italian prime minister, Matteo Renzi, and the French president, François Hollande.
For historical and geographical reasons, Italy has been leading the coordination of a force capable of operating off the Libyan coast and also on land to help train a Libyan national army. Nato is now likely to take over some of this planning including the building of reception centres for Africans who have been turned back from Europe.
Advertisement
Richard Lindsey, head of security policy at the Foreign Office, recently admitted to parliament that Operation Sophia had been working to date without a significant partner in Libya. He said: “If that changes, it changes the whole dynamic of what Operation Sophia can achieve. There has been to date a gap in our comprehensive strategy and that has been in Libya.”
Obama briefed the four EU leaders on his plan to send a further 250 special forces to help train Kurdish forces mainly in the north of Syria.
He said: “They are not going to be leading the fight on the ground but they will be essential in providing the training and assisting local forces as they continue to drive Isil [Islamic State] back.”
Obama sent 50 US special operations forces to Syria last year in what officials described as a counter-terrorism mission rather than an effort to tip the scales in the war. He said: “These terrorists will learn the same lessons that others before them have, which is: your hatred is no match for our nations, united in defence of our way of life.”
The insertion of further US troops is hardly a counter balance to the large-scale Russian and Iranian presence in Syria and does not represent a total abandonment of a negotiated settlement. Talks in Geneva broke down last week over breaches of the cessation of hostilities and Obama again said he was pressing the Syrian regime’s chief ally, the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, to reinstate the ceasefire.
Obama’s use of the word reinstate is taken as a clear sign that the White House believes the ceasefire has all but disintegrated; regime and rebel bombardments claimed 26 lives on Sunday.
Eight weeks into the declared truce between President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and non-jihadi rebels, violence has escalated around Aleppo, with dozens of people killed by government airstrikes and rebel rockets.